
Marc Jacobs and Nirvana Fight It out in Court Over a Smiley Face, But It’s More Complicated Than It Seems

When we speak of the ‘80s music scene, the name, Nirvana, almost always pops to mind first. The iconic musical group is a classic in the rock genre, still widely popular despite having disbanded years ago. If your memory needs some jogging, this was the same rock band that popularized the smiley logo with Xs as eyes.
One look at that yellow squiggly drawing and you’ll immediately recognize it as the band’s iconic symbol. So when Marc Jacobs released a grudge collection last year with a similarly looking design, everybody raised their eyebrows, including the musicians themselves.
Marc Jacobs’ T-Shirt

Marc Jacobs released the design last year
Marc Jacobs debuted the collection Bootleg Grunge Redux lineup in commemoration of its 25th anniversary, which included a black shirt that had a yellow squiggly smiley face with M and J instead of eyes and the word HEAVEN emblazoned above the illustration. T-shirts bearing the design were sold in its outlets, Neiman Marcus, and Saks Fifth Avenue shops.
History
Any fan of Nirvana would immediately see the resemblance between Marc Jacobs’ design and the band’s logo, which was born in September 1991 when DGC Records and the group celebrated Nevermind, their first major album.
The launch party invitations featured the iconic smiley face that we all know today and it had since been tied with the legendary musicians.
Before 2018 ends, Nirvana LLC, composed of Krist Novoselic and Dave Grohl plus frontman Kurt Cobain’s estate filed a lawsuit against Marc Jacobs and the retailers for copyright infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, and trademark infringement.

The logo was in an invitation for the release party of Nevermind
Even though it is obvious that the designer illustrations looked like that of the band, the plaintiff must prove that they own the X-Eye Smiley Face design, which was allegedly made by the late Kurt around 1991. Nirvana is asking for damages and to stop the sale of the design.
Motion to Dismiss
In retaliation, Marc Jacobs tried to dismiss the case but admitted that the design was inspired by Nirvana’s logo. However, the fashion guru argued he reinterpreted and added his touch to such an already commonplace picture.
The brand further debated that the design is not exactly the same because the Xs were replaced by the letters M and J. The band name was also nowhere in sight, replaced by the word HEAVEN, printed in the same typeface.

Kurt Cobain allegedly created the logo
Plus, Marc Jacobs said the lawsuit didn’t provide evidence that Kurt passed his rights to his estate. But, Nirvana contested that the registration certificate signed on July 29, 1998 is already proof that the logo was the band’s intellectual property. The court denied the fashion house’s request to dissolve the lawsuit giving the band a green light to push the case forward.
Countersuit
In a surprising turn of events, Marc Jacobs is countersuing the band, saying the lack of a person who knows about the creation of the design and the 166 Registration deficiencies used by Nirvana in its lawsuit are enough to give the band a taste of their own medicine.
In the deposition, both Krist and Dave revealed they didn’t know who made the design. Now, the brand is asking to remove the copyright on the logo in question.
More in Celeb Justice
-
Understanding Market Abuse Letters and Their Growing Significance
The financial markets thrive on trust, transparency, and accountability. Protecting these pillars is a top priority for regulators like the Financial...
November 29, 2024 -
Identity Verification Explained – Methods, Benefits, and Challenges
In a rapidly advancing digital landscape, where interactions and transactions are increasingly happening online, the need for effective identity verification has...
November 20, 2024 -
Want Better Legal Service? Learn How to Scare a Lawyer Into Taking Action
If you’re involved in a legal case, or perhaps you’re an attorney working with clients in litigation, you may have wondered...
November 15, 2024 -
Facebook & Instagram to Launch Facial Recognition Technology to Combat Celebrity Scam Ads
Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook and Instagram, is taking a bold new step to combat the surge of celebrity scam...
November 5, 2024 -
How AI Legal Drafting Tools Are Transforming In-House Legal Teams
The rise of AI legal drafting tools is reshaping in-house legal teams, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and control. Generative AI, in particular,...
November 1, 2024 -
What is Account Takeover, How Does It Happen & How Dangerous Is It? A Comprehensive Guide
Account takeover (ATO) is one of the fastest-growing forms of identity fraud today. This sneaky cyberattack occurs when fraudsters gain unauthorized...
October 25, 2024 -
What Kamala Harris Did As A Prosecutor Tells a Lot About Her Approach Toward Criminal Justice
When examining Kamala Harris as a prosecutor, you get a complex picture of a leader who made tough decisions, some of...
October 18, 2024 -
Shakira Tax Fraud Case: Singer Pushes Back, Claims Discrimination
Shakira, the Colombian pop star celebrated for her global hits, is embroiled in a significant legal battle over allegations of tax...
October 8, 2024 -
Here’s Why Asking ChatGPT For Legal Advice is A Bad Idea
With the rise of AI tools like ChatGPT, people are increasingly turning to it for quick solutions to various problems, including...
October 5, 2024