
No Fault Divorces Introduced to End Mud Slinging

The government has confirmed that legislation introducing no-fault divorce is to be introduced after launching a consultation last autumn on reforming the law. This reform would remove the need for separating couples to wait for years or allocate blame in order to divorce.
The government has put its plans to remove fault from the divorce process on a legislative footing as justice secretary David Gauke pledged to end unnecessary ‘mudslinging’. The lord chancellor said he was proud to introduce the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill to the House of Commons yesterday.
Landmark reforms introducing no-fault divorce

Cottonbro/ Pexels | If you accuse someone of mud-slinging, you are accusing them of making insulting, unfair, and damaging remarks about their opponents
The bill will replace the requirement to evidence conduct or separation ‘fact’ with the provision of a statement of irretrievable breakdown. The possibility of contesting the decision to divorce will be removed. The court will be able to make a conditional order after 20 weeks have passed from the start of proceedings.
Previously, one spouse was forced to make accusations about the other’s conduct, such as ‘unreasonable behaviour’ or adultery, or face years of separation before a divorce could be granted. This was regardless of whether a couple had made a mutual decision to separate. The pressure to change the law on divorce has been mounting for a long time but was highlighted by the case of Tina Owens when the Supreme Court ruled in July 2018 that she could not divorce her husband until a period of five years had elapsed, as in the opinion of the judges, she had not proved any other grounds.

Cottonbro/ Pexels | No-fault divorce is the most common modern type of marriage dissolution
Following the implementation of the Act, the government has also committed to looking into further the law around financial settlements after a divorce, such as the dividing of assets or maintenance payments.
What does this act mean for the applicants?
The changes mean that a spouse, or a couple jointly, can now apply for a divorce by stating their marriage has broken down irretrievably. It removes unnecessary finger-pointing and acrimony at a time when emotions are already running high and spares children from witnessing their parent’s mudslinging. The Act also introduces a new minimum timeframe of 20 weeks between the start of proceedings and when individuals may apply for a conditional order of divorce. This will offer time to reflect, and potentially turn back, or where reconciliation is not possible to agree on important arrangements for the future, such as those involving children, finance and property.

RODNAE Productions/ Pexels | The change has been welcomed by experts who said it will aid couples to move forward
The avoidance of mud-slinging could also make resolving financial matters and making arrangements for children much less stressful and enable easier co-parenting for the future. No-fault divorce could also see the ending of a marriage move from a relatively expensive court-based exercise to a largely administrative one, making the divorce process itself potentially quicker and cheaper.
More in Criminal Attorney
-
Understanding Market Abuse Letters and Their Growing Significance
The financial markets thrive on trust, transparency, and accountability. Protecting these pillars is a top priority for regulators like the Financial...
November 29, 2024 -
Identity Verification Explained – Methods, Benefits, and Challenges
In a rapidly advancing digital landscape, where interactions and transactions are increasingly happening online, the need for effective identity verification has...
November 20, 2024 -
Want Better Legal Service? Learn How to Scare a Lawyer Into Taking Action
If you’re involved in a legal case, or perhaps you’re an attorney working with clients in litigation, you may have wondered...
November 15, 2024 -
Facebook & Instagram to Launch Facial Recognition Technology to Combat Celebrity Scam Ads
Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook and Instagram, is taking a bold new step to combat the surge of celebrity scam...
November 5, 2024 -
How AI Legal Drafting Tools Are Transforming In-House Legal Teams
The rise of AI legal drafting tools is reshaping in-house legal teams, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and control. Generative AI, in particular,...
November 1, 2024 -
What is Account Takeover, How Does It Happen & How Dangerous Is It? A Comprehensive Guide
Account takeover (ATO) is one of the fastest-growing forms of identity fraud today. This sneaky cyberattack occurs when fraudsters gain unauthorized...
October 25, 2024 -
What Kamala Harris Did As A Prosecutor Tells a Lot About Her Approach Toward Criminal Justice
When examining Kamala Harris as a prosecutor, you get a complex picture of a leader who made tough decisions, some of...
October 18, 2024 -
Shakira Tax Fraud Case: Singer Pushes Back, Claims Discrimination
Shakira, the Colombian pop star celebrated for her global hits, is embroiled in a significant legal battle over allegations of tax...
October 8, 2024 -
Here’s Why Asking ChatGPT For Legal Advice is A Bad Idea
With the rise of AI tools like ChatGPT, people are increasingly turning to it for quick solutions to various problems, including...
October 5, 2024