Marc Jacobs and Nirvana Fight It out in Court Over a Smiley Face, But It’s More Complicated Than It Seems
When we speak of the ‘80s music scene, the name, Nirvana, almost always pops to mind first. The iconic musical group is a classic in the rock genre, still widely popular despite having disbanded years ago. If your memory needs some jogging, this was the same rock band that popularized the smiley logo with Xs as eyes.
One look at that yellow squiggly drawing and you’ll immediately recognize it as the band’s iconic symbol. So when Marc Jacobs released a grudge collection last year with a similarly looking design, everybody raised their eyebrows, including the musicians themselves.
Marc Jacobs’ T-Shirt

Marc Jacobs released the design last year
Marc Jacobs debuted the collection Bootleg Grunge Redux lineup in commemoration of its 25th anniversary, which included a black shirt that had a yellow squiggly smiley face with M and J instead of eyes and the word HEAVEN emblazoned above the illustration. T-shirts bearing the design were sold in its outlets, Neiman Marcus, and Saks Fifth Avenue shops.
History
Any fan of Nirvana would immediately see the resemblance between Marc Jacobs’ design and the band’s logo, which was born in September 1991 when DGC Records and the group celebrated Nevermind, their first major album.
The launch party invitations featured the iconic smiley face that we all know today and it had since been tied with the legendary musicians.
Before 2018 ends, Nirvana LLC, composed of Krist Novoselic and Dave Grohl plus frontman Kurt Cobain’s estate filed a lawsuit against Marc Jacobs and the retailers for copyright infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, and trademark infringement.

The logo was in an invitation for the release party of Nevermind
Even though it is obvious that the designer illustrations looked like that of the band, the plaintiff must prove that they own the X-Eye Smiley Face design, which was allegedly made by the late Kurt around 1991. Nirvana is asking for damages and to stop the sale of the design.
Motion to Dismiss
In retaliation, Marc Jacobs tried to dismiss the case but admitted that the design was inspired by Nirvana’s logo. However, the fashion guru argued he reinterpreted and added his touch to such an already commonplace picture.
The brand further debated that the design is not exactly the same because the Xs were replaced by the letters M and J. The band name was also nowhere in sight, replaced by the word HEAVEN, printed in the same typeface.

Kurt Cobain allegedly created the logo
Plus, Marc Jacobs said the lawsuit didn’t provide evidence that Kurt passed his rights to his estate. But, Nirvana contested that the registration certificate signed on July 29, 1998 is already proof that the logo was the band’s intellectual property. The court denied the fashion house’s request to dissolve the lawsuit giving the band a green light to push the case forward.
Countersuit
In a surprising turn of events, Marc Jacobs is countersuing the band, saying the lack of a person who knows about the creation of the design and the 166 Registration deficiencies used by Nirvana in its lawsuit are enough to give the band a taste of their own medicine.
In the deposition, both Krist and Dave revealed they didn’t know who made the design. Now, the brand is asking to remove the copyright on the logo in question.
More in Celeb Justice
-
New York to Mail Out One-Time Inflation Rebates. Here’s the Eligibility List
New York is preparing to send out its first-ever inflation refund checks, providing financial relief to millions of residents as prices...
October 3, 2025 -
Here’s What Artists Should Know About Copyright & Its Implications
Copyright protects your art from the moment you create it. The second your drawing, painting, sculpture, or photo is fixed in...
September 27, 2025 -
Everything to Know About Vogue America’s New Editor, Chloe Malle
Chloe Malle just stepped into one of the most powerful roles in fashion media: Head of Editorial Content at Vogue America....
September 21, 2025 -
Did Barron Trump Apply to Harvard? Clearing Up the Rumors
Speculation often swirls around public figures, and in recent months Barron Trump’s college choices became part of the conversation. Questions surfaced...
September 20, 2025 -
Can You Be Naked in Texas?
The Texas public nudity law isn’t as simple as “no clothes, you are in trouble.” It all comes down to intent,...
September 13, 2025 -
Why AI Is Now a Necessity, Not a Choice, for Law Firms
Artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic concept for the legal industry. It is steadily changing how law firms operate, not...
September 13, 2025 -
Waikiki Lifeguard Cleared in Confrontation With Notorious Criminal
On a hot day at Kuhio Beach, veteran lifeguard Christopher Kekaulike Kam stepped in when things got out of control. A...
August 13, 2025 -
Gawking at the Coldplay ‘Kiss Cam’ Affair Is Voyeurism at Its Worst!
Coldplay concerts are meant to be joyful. But during a recent show, a playful kiss cam bit turned into a public...
August 6, 2025 -
Essential Safety and Success Resources for Trans Journalists
Trans journalists go through tough spaces every day. In a field that often tests your limits, knowing where to turn for...
July 30, 2025