
Austrian Man Wins 390,000 Euros in a Bizarre Gender Discrimination Case

For the past few years, more and more organizations are trying to promote gender equality as they allow women to contribute to the organization in the same amount as men do. This discourse leads to the implementation of drastic changes in policies to hire female employees on important positions in the company. This enables women to take part in decision-making, and they can voice out their concerns easily without feeling inferior in any way.
What about Gender Discrimination on Men?
However, equality in the workplace must extend in both ways to encourage employing people based on their skills, work experience, and credentials, not on gender. We need to realize that men can also fall victims of discrimination when companies tend to give women more access to the possibilities it has to offer. An Austrian man stepped forward to lead an example of this case. Just last Monday, he won 300,000 Euros on a gender discrimination case against a female employee.

Peter Franzmayr filed a gender inequality case to fight for his promotion
The Austrian court ruled in favor of transport ministry official Peter Franzmayr in a case of gender discrimination in his workplace. Franzmayr claimed that he got sidestepped for an internal promotion when their boss gave the position he rightfully deserved to a woman instead.
The complainant filed the case in 2011 when the then-Minister of Transport, Innovation, and Technology Doris Bures of the Social Democrat (SPÖ) and the current Second President of Austria’s Parliament, wanted to merge the two departments and they needed a sole manager to handle the new unit. Aside from Franzmayr, the woman named Zechner and the other men applied for the promotion. Franzmayr believed that they all possessed the qualifications and skills for the available position.
Doris Bures Favored Zecher Over Anyone Else

Doris Bures served as Minister of Transport, Innovation, and Technology from 2008 – 2014
Unfortunately, Ursula Zecher ended up as the head of Schienen-Control a rail regulator in 2011. Franzmayr couldn’t believe the results since he ranked about 0.25% higher than her. He believed that Bures became bias in her decision since she was the only woman among the three candidates.
The Austrian man cried foul over gender discrimination that prompted him to file a case and fight for his promotion. However, Bures defended her decision and claimed they followed the SOP in choosing the successful candidate for the job. As an advocate for gender equality, she said that hiring Zecher uplifted the dignity and contribution of women in the Austrian politics.
The High Court Ruled In Favor of Franzmayr
Fortunately, the Austrian court saw past through Bures’ bias decision. They ordered Bures and Zecher to pay 317, 386 euros to compensate Franzmayr for losing his job. They also need to compensate the salary he would’ve earned in the position plus damages and interest. Their verdict stated that Franzmayr experienced discrimination when he applied for promotion. They also noted how Zechner obtained a political advantage against the other candidates due to her gender.

Peter Franzmayr served in the transport ministry when he applied for the managerial position back in 2011
After he left the Ministry, Franzmayr worked for four years as a lawyer before he came back to the public sector as town municipal director of Wels in 2016. Earlier this month, he received an appointment as the supervisory board of Asfinag, the publicly-owned motorway network in Austria, by Transport Minister Norbert Hofer of the far-right Freedom Party. Zechner, coincidentally, also started working for Asfinag as a managing director earlier this month and is commercial matters.
More in Legal Advice
-
Understanding Market Abuse Letters and Their Growing Significance
The financial markets thrive on trust, transparency, and accountability. Protecting these pillars is a top priority for regulators like the Financial...
November 29, 2024 -
Identity Verification Explained – Methods, Benefits, and Challenges
In a rapidly advancing digital landscape, where interactions and transactions are increasingly happening online, the need for effective identity verification has...
November 20, 2024 -
Want Better Legal Service? Learn How to Scare a Lawyer Into Taking Action
If you’re involved in a legal case, or perhaps you’re an attorney working with clients in litigation, you may have wondered...
November 15, 2024 -
Facebook & Instagram to Launch Facial Recognition Technology to Combat Celebrity Scam Ads
Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook and Instagram, is taking a bold new step to combat the surge of celebrity scam...
November 5, 2024 -
How AI Legal Drafting Tools Are Transforming In-House Legal Teams
The rise of AI legal drafting tools is reshaping in-house legal teams, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and control. Generative AI, in particular,...
November 1, 2024 -
What is Account Takeover, How Does It Happen & How Dangerous Is It? A Comprehensive Guide
Account takeover (ATO) is one of the fastest-growing forms of identity fraud today. This sneaky cyberattack occurs when fraudsters gain unauthorized...
October 25, 2024 -
What Kamala Harris Did As A Prosecutor Tells a Lot About Her Approach Toward Criminal Justice
When examining Kamala Harris as a prosecutor, you get a complex picture of a leader who made tough decisions, some of...
October 18, 2024 -
Shakira Tax Fraud Case: Singer Pushes Back, Claims Discrimination
Shakira, the Colombian pop star celebrated for her global hits, is embroiled in a significant legal battle over allegations of tax...
October 8, 2024 -
Here’s Why Asking ChatGPT For Legal Advice is A Bad Idea
With the rise of AI tools like ChatGPT, people are increasingly turning to it for quick solutions to various problems, including...
October 5, 2024