A Senator Brings Her Newborn After Lawmakers Changed Their Rules
Maile Pearl Bowlsbey is just over a week old and already is helping force more change in the Senate than most seasoned lawmakers can even dream. On Thursday she joined her mother, Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth, on the Senate floor for a vote.
The newborn’s appearance was made possible by a unanimous decision by the Senate on Wednesday evening to change its rules, which typically allow only senators and a handful of staff into the Senate chamber during votes. Now, lawmakers can bring along children under one-year-old.

Senator Tammy Duckworth enters the Senate Floor whilst carrying her two weeks-old baby
In response to the change on Wednesday, Duckworth thanked her colleagues for helping bring the Senate into the 21st Century by recognizing that sometimes new parents also have responsibilities at work. She had also added that these policies aren’t just a women’s issue, they are a common-sense economic issue. Duckworth gave birth to Maile, her second child, on April 9 and wanted to keep her newborn nearby when she is doing her job as a senator.
How They Changed the Rules
Alabama Republican Richard Shelby said even before the rule change that they ought to accommodate people as much as they can. He further added that The Senate has evolved slowly for a long time, but evolution is always going on. Rules Committee chairman Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said some of that slow evolution might be because Duckworth is the first senator to ever give birth while in office.
There haven’t been many moms bringing little babies on the floor in the Senate in the past because there haven’t been moms having babies in the Senate. This is what Blunt told reporters on Tuesday. Blunt also said he had been working with Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, to approve the measure quickly and without opposition from any senators.

Other Senators were receptive to the rule because of the times that we live in today
Every day, moms and dads have to balance being great parents and successful professionals, and workplaces need to recognize that reality. Klobuchar further said that The United States Senate should be no exception. The bill seems like a fairly common-sense accommodation that reflects the Senate as it is today — with 23 women and a handful of young parents.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said the rule is also narrowly written to allow parents of children under a year to perform their duties without being separated from their children and to allow the business of the Senate to go on uninterrupted. Collins said it was a very practical debate of how does a new mother manage to vote and yet take care of her child. She adds that now, obviously, it would interfere with our ability to get our work done if we had lots of toddlers crawling around.
The road was all uphill because of Past traditions

The Senate is very traditional, and introducing new things is usually quite difficult to be accepted
All of this might seem like a pretty simple and logical change, but the Senate is often a slow, tradition-bound place. The rules are so hard to change that it took Budget Committee chairman Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., years to get his fellow senators to allow him to bring a laptop to the floor to keep track of tricky amendments during a budget debate. Enzi also said that he kept on receiving complaints because of this.
They said he was disrupting the process of the Senate, and one senator even told him that he couldn’t type, and if Enzi was typing he’d feel compelled to explain to his constituents that he couldn’t. Enzi said that allowing a parent to bring her infant along so she can follow through with Senate duties is an entirely different, more important issue. Plus, he says, Duckworth’s argument has another impressive edge: “Mothers are more persuasive than men.”
The US Senate, like every other governing body in the world, needs to adjust to the times we live in today. More women are going being in the Senate, and many them might give birth and their children will need them. As long as the presence of the children doesn’t hinder the proceedings, there is no reason to disallow such a thing.
More in Legal Advice
-
New York to Mail Out One-Time Inflation Rebates. Here’s the Eligibility List
New York is preparing to send out its first-ever inflation refund checks, providing financial relief to millions of residents as prices...
October 3, 2025 -
Here’s What Artists Should Know About Copyright & Its Implications
Copyright protects your art from the moment you create it. The second your drawing, painting, sculpture, or photo is fixed in...
September 27, 2025 -
Everything to Know About Vogue America’s New Editor, Chloe Malle
Chloe Malle just stepped into one of the most powerful roles in fashion media: Head of Editorial Content at Vogue America....
September 21, 2025 -
Did Barron Trump Apply to Harvard? Clearing Up the Rumors
Speculation often swirls around public figures, and in recent months Barron Trump’s college choices became part of the conversation. Questions surfaced...
September 20, 2025 -
Can You Be Naked in Texas?
The Texas public nudity law isn’t as simple as “no clothes, you are in trouble.” It all comes down to intent,...
September 13, 2025 -
Why AI Is Now a Necessity, Not a Choice, for Law Firms
Artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic concept for the legal industry. It is steadily changing how law firms operate, not...
September 13, 2025 -
Waikiki Lifeguard Cleared in Confrontation With Notorious Criminal
On a hot day at Kuhio Beach, veteran lifeguard Christopher Kekaulike Kam stepped in when things got out of control. A...
August 13, 2025 -
Gawking at the Coldplay ‘Kiss Cam’ Affair Is Voyeurism at Its Worst!
Coldplay concerts are meant to be joyful. But during a recent show, a playful kiss cam bit turned into a public...
August 6, 2025 -
Essential Safety and Success Resources for Trans Journalists
Trans journalists go through tough spaces every day. In a field that often tests your limits, knowing where to turn for...
July 30, 2025