Angelina Jolie Challenges Brad Pitt’s ‘Abusive’ NDA in $500 Million Winery Face-Off
The once-powerful Hollywood couple, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, are locked in a bitter legal battle over their co-owned French winery, Château Miraval. The estimated $500 million estate has become a focal point of contention, with the latest dispute hinging on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
Jolie’s legal team is contesting a recent motion filed by Pitt’s lawyers. This motion demands that Jolie disclose all NDAs she has entered into with any third party, not those related to Miraval. Jolie’s lawyers vehemently oppose this request, calling it “expensive,” “wasteful,” “unreasonable,” and even “abusive.”
NDA Dispute at the Heart of the Conflict

Instagram | the.brad.pitt | The disagreement centers on Pitt’s reported NDA request from Jolie during negotiations over her stake in Miraval.
The core of the disagreement lies in the NDA Pitt reportedly requested from Jolie during negotiations over the sale of her stake in Miraval. Jolie alleges that this NDA was broad and aimed at silencing her from speaking about past accusations of abuse against Pitt and their children. These accusations involve a physical altercation that allegedly occurred on a 2016 private plane flight from France to California.
Jolie has steadfastly maintained that the unfair NDA was the primary reason the Miraval sale deal fell through. She sold her shares to a subsidiary of Stoli Group, a move that Pitt has challenged in court.
Pitt’s Team Seeks Leverage Through Past NDAs
In an attempt to gain leverage, Pitt’s legal team is now seeking access to Jolie’s past NDAs. Their argument hinges on the notion that if Jolie had before agreed to NDAs with other parties, then her objections to Pitt’s NDA about Miraval wouldn’t hold weight.
They believe this information could help them disprove Jolie’s claims that Pitt’s NDA request was the sole reason the sale collapsed.
Jolie’s Lawyers Fight Back

Instagram | angelina_jolie.fans_ | Jolie’s legal team disputes Pitt’s request, citing invasion of privacy for Jolie and others involved in her past NDAs.
Jolie’s legal team refutes this argument. They contend that Pitt’s request is not only an invasion of privacy for Jolie but also for the other parties involved in her past NDAs. These NDAs likely include movie studios, brands, and even personal staff members.
Disclosing these agreements could reveal details about Jolie’s compensation and the compensation of others involved. Furthermore, Jolie’s lawyers argue that these past NDAs are irrelevant to the specific issue at hand, which is the sale of Miraval.
A Heated Battle with Underlying Tensions

Instagram | people | The legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt reaches beyond the winery.
The ongoing legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt extends far beyond the winery itself. The NDA dispute highlights the complexities and emotional weight often associated with domestic violence cases. Jolie’s lawyers allege that Pitt’s attempt to unearth past NDAs is a tactic to downplay the seriousness of the abuse allegations and silence her.
A Look Ahead – May Hearing and Potential Trial
A court hearing on the NDA dispute is scheduled for May 16th, 2024. A full trial on the broader winery ownership issues is not expected this year. This ongoing saga sheds light on the challenges of disentangling personal and financial ties after a high-profile celebrity divorce.
With both sides entrenched in their positions, it remains to be seen how the NDA dispute will be resolved and how it will impact the ownership of Château Miraval.
More in Celeb Justice
-
How to Secure a Government Job During Budget Cuts
Federal hiring slows down when budgets tighten, yet it never stops completely. Agencies still need analysts, advisors, and policy staff to...
March 1, 2026 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Billionaire Father-in-Law Breaks Silence on the Family Feud
The Beckham family drama just took another sharp turn. This time, the voice cutting through the noise belongs to billionaire investor...
February 22, 2026 -
Notre Dame Faces Faculty Resigns After Controversial Appointment
Tension is rising at the University of Notre Dame after two scholars cut formal ties with the Liu Institute for Asia...
February 22, 2026 -
High Court Upholds Malay Celeb Preacher Da’i Syed’s Rape Conviction
The Shah Alam High Court has spoken, and it spoke clearly. Celebrity preacher Da’i Syed will go to prison now, not...
February 15, 2026 -
Venezuela Opens Oil Industry as U.S. Threatens Cuba Tariffs
Venezuela has passed a significant law change aimed at opening its oil industry to foreign investment. The move, endorsed by acting...
February 15, 2026 -
Is a ChatGPT-Written Will Legal?
At first glance, using AI to draft a will seems like a smart idea. It’s fast, free, and has a modern...
February 6, 2026 -
Prince Harry Supports Elizabeth Hurley in Tabloid Privacy Case
London’s High Court became the center of attention as Prince Harry appeared in support of Elizabeth Hurley during an emotional hearing...
February 6, 2026 -
5 Ways AI Is Transforming Daily Legal Workflows
AI did not storm into law firms with fireworks. It slipped in through contracts, research tabs, inboxes, and meeting notes. By...
February 1, 2026 -
How to Legally Protect Your Side Hustle Without Spending a Fortune
Starting a side hustle is a practical way to test a business idea, generate extra income, or lay the foundation for...
February 1, 2026